I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION
46. The applicant complained that her compulsory placement and continued deprivation of liberty in a social care home amounted to a violation of her right to liberty, as provided for in Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows:
“1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law:
(e) the lawful detention of persons ... of unsound mind...”
47. The Government contested that argument in general terms.
II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION
72. The applicant complained, in essence, that she had no effective procedure by which she could challenge the lawfulness and the necessity of her continued stay in the social care home. She relied on Article 5 § 4 of the Convention which provides as follows:
“Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful.”
73. The Government contested that argument.